There are a few small varieties for 1881, including obverse 1 and 1a, double punching of various letters, and some N's missing part of their serifs. For the most part I do not bother to sort these out.
The major varieties in 1882 are obverse 1 and 2 which I do sort out. There are minor varieties of obverse 1/2 or 2/1 as well as some double punched lettering, but I make no attempt to sort those out.
Obverse 1 and 2 occur in 1884, with obverse 1 much scarcer than obverse 2.
Obverse 1 and 2 occur in 1886. Obverse 1 is somewhat scarcer than obverse 2.
Only obverse 2 occurs in 1887.
All 1888 cents are obverse 2. Some 1888 cents are found with doubling on part of the date, with either one or two of the 8's doubled. Those with the middle 8 doubled are listed by Hans Zoell as RT9e.
No Canadian 1 cent coins were minted in 1889. There were also no 50 cents, and the 5, 10 and 25 cents are all scarce. There was an economic contraction in Canada during 1889 and the first part of 1890, which is likely what reduced the demand on new coins needed for the economy that year.
All 1890 are obverse 3.
In 1891 there are three major varieties OF large cents, each of which can be found with either obverse 2 or 3:
Depending on the reference you are using, they two parts of each designation can be reversed. For example, SD LL for Small Date with Large Leaves might also be designated as LL SD for Large Leaves with Small Date.
This is the only year with three difference obverse types, listed in the references as obverses 2, 3 and 4. Many peole have trouble telling these obverses a part.
The first problem is the references list obverse 3, but in 1892 they actually used 3a which has long upright on the center of the E's, the only obverse with that feature. This will be clear in all grades. In my opinion this should have been called obverse 4 but as all references call it 3 I will list them that way.
If you have elimiated obverse 3, obverse 4 had a fairly heavy jowel line coming down from the mouth bending back along the jaw, while the ribbon end on the shoulder is fairly pronounced. Obverse 2 has a minor jowel line only coming 1/2 way down from the mouth and does not bend back along the jaw, while the ribbon end is weaker nearly blending into the shoulder. These differences will be difficult to see on coins grading below VG-8.
From 1893 to 1901 only obverse 4 was used, so I will not mention any obverse types for these dates.
There is a scarce variety in 1894 cent where the 4 is thicker than most examples. Some references call it large and others a thick 4 but there is no significant size difference so thick 4 describes it better. In my experience the thick for is scarcer, possibly by 50 to 1.
There are two varieties in 1896 with most of the coin a very evenly spaced date but on a few examples the 6 is farther from the 9 resulting in what is known as the FAR 6 variety. The easiest way to tell the difference is that on the regular variety the 6 is centered below the NT of CENTS, but on the Far 6 variety the right edge of the 6 is below the left edge of the T.
Normally coins wear equally on both sides but starting around 1897 and continuing for about 10 years, some large cents were struck with a concave reverse die resulting in a convex reverse which wears more quickly than the obverse. Such coins can be Fine or VF on the portrait but yet on the reverse the CE of CENTS is very weak or even worn through. There is no standard way to grade such coins so will split grade them, listing the obverse grade first and the reverse as G-4 or G-6 depending on how worn it is, and will price them accordingly.
While not listed in the CCN trend sheet or the standard listings in the Charlton catalogue, the position of the H on the 1898 H 1 cent comes in two major varieties of a low and high H. On the high H the top left of the H will touch or slightly over lay the left above. On the low H the H will not touch the leaf at all. On looking at a group of 20 of these right now, there was a roughly even split between the two types so there is no difference in rarity or price and as this is a relatively unimportant variety I will not note this variety in my listings, but if you are specific about which you want when ordering, I will try to sort it out for you.
1900 H CENT
The 1900 H cent causes some confusion because unlike the 1907 H where the H is below the date but above the ring of beads, for 1900 the H is lower down, between the bottom leaf and the denticles at the rim, and is small and can be difficult to see. It actually touches the bottom of the leaf
The average quality in which we see the 1900 1 cents is much nicer than for earlier dates, which is reflected in the lower prices for higher grade examples. The results from it being the last year for Queen Victoria 1 cents which resulted in people putting them away to save them as the new Edward VII designs were introduced. To this day people still do this when a type is phased out, expecting them to one day become rare and valuable, but actually causing them to be the most common and least valuable in the series. We see this with the 1920 large cent, 1936 small cent, 1952 George V cent, and the 2012 final issue of the 1 cent.
Prior to 1908, any Canadian coin which was not mint marked was struck at the Royal Mint in London, England, but starting in 1908 non-mint marked coins were struck in Canada at the Royal Canadian Mint in Ottawa. The 1907 coins with an "H" mint mark (below the leaves on the reverse, centered under the date) were struck at the Heaton mint in Birmingham, England.
This Obverse type was designed by G. W. DeSalles, while the reverse continues the type designed by Leonard C. Wyon used since 1858. These were struck from an alloy containing 95% copper, 4% tin and 1% zinc. The standard weight was 5.67 grams with a diameter of 25.4 mm (1 inch).
With a mintage of about 2 million, 1905 is the scarcest of the Edward VII large cent, although none of them can be considered rare.
1907 H CENT
The H on a 1907 H is centered below the date, just above the inner ring a beads, unlike some earlier dates where it is lower down between the leaves and the outer ring of beads. The exact postion and size of the H variest slightly between coins, and on some coins can be very small.
The Royal Canadian Mint opened in Ottawa in 1908 after which nearly all Canadian coins were minted in Canada. While the designs and alloy specification remain the same, there appears to be some type of change in the metallurgy. When they tone they are often a paler brown than earlier coins, and if cleaned have are more yellow-brown color. Often there are streaks of brighter yellow that do not tone as much as the rest of the coin, which if light does not affect things but when more dramatic I personally find somewhat unattractive (I will describe it when dramatic). I don't know enough about the alloys to say what changed, but I suspect there is an increase in the zinc content in some specimens (that could cause the more yellow color and different toning) and poorer quality mixing of the alloys than was done in England would explain the streaks.
This Obverse type was designed by Sir E. B. MacKennal, and the reverse by W. H. J. Blakemore. These were struck from an alloy containing 95% copper, 4% tin and 1% zinc. The standard weight was 5.67 grams with a diameter of 25.4 mm (1 inch). All were struck at the Royal Canadian mint in Ottawa.
George V coins were introduced in 1911 without "DEI GRATIA", Latin for "God's Grace", in the obverse inscription. Known as the "GODLESS COINS" there was a public out rage or in 1912 "DEI GRATIA" returns to Canadian coins making the 1911's a one year type coin.
With a mintage of about 3.4 million the 1914 is the scarcest date of George V large cents, although only by a little and only commands a premium in the higher grades. The 1911 in has a higher mintage but due to being a one year type is in higher demand than the 1914.
1920 LARGE CENT
1920 was both the last year in which they struck large cents, and the first year in which small cents were struck. A considerable number of the 1920 large cents were melted for striking of 1920 small cents, but both large and small cents remain relatively common.
1998 LARGE CENT
To commemorate the Royal Canadian Mint's 90th anniversary, special sets of coins were struck with the sizes, alloys (other than the 1 cent), and general reverse designs of the 1908 coins but Queen Elizabeth's portrait and the date shown as "1908 - 2008". The one cent coins are the only large cents struck after 1920, and have the unusual feature of being copper plated silver, possible the only copper plated silver coins ever made by any mint. The early sets were struck with an antiqued matte-proof finish that proved unpopular with collectors, but an interesting variety on the one cent because the designer forgot to place the word "Canada" below the Queen's portrait, making these the only Canadian coin without "CANADA" anywhere on it. Sets struck later in the year were issued as mirror-proofs, but with "CANADA" added below the Queen's portrait on the one cent coins.
2011 LARGE CENT
To commemorate the 100th anniversary off the 1911 silver dollar special sets replicating all the denominations of 1911 coins were struck in 2011 coins using the George V portrait and obverse inscription. On the 1 cent the reverse is similar to the 1911 1 cent but the inscription reads 1 CENT CANADA 1911-2011. The alloy of these one cents is pure copper struck to a bright proof finish, at 5.67 grams, 25.4 mm diameter and 1.6 mm thick. Just under 6000 sets were made, so these are relatively scarce coins.
In 1920, mostly to reduce the cost of coinage production, the government ceased to issue large cents at the standard of the British half penny, and began striking small cents of the same weight standard as the American cent.
The obverse design is slightly different than that on the large cents and is by Sir E.B. MacKennal, whose initials B.M. appear on the truncation of the bust. The reverse design is a totally new by Fred Lewis. The alloy also changed slightly to 95.5% copper, 3% tin and 1.5% zinc. The standard weight is 3.24 grams, with a diameter of 19.05 mm (3/4 inch).
1920 SMALL CENT
With a mintage of about 1,2400,000 this is the third lowest mintage of small cents.
With a mintage of just over 1 million, this is the second lowest mintage small cent, but the difference between it and 1925 is only about 2%
With a mintage of just barely over 1 million, this is the lowest mintage date small cent, beating the 1923 by less than 20,000 coins.
There are three major position varieties of the final 9 of 1929, low, middle and high, although every die was probably slightly different and there were many dies with minor differences. All standard references fail to discuss the middle 9 variety resulting in people mistaking middle 9 examples for high 9's. Both middle and low 9's are common so I only list the high 9's separately.
1937 saw a major change in Canadian coin designs, making them somewhat more artistic, and now each Canadian denomination had its own distinctive reverse designs (earlier coins were all variations on the same design).
The obverse (common to all the denominations) was designed by T. H. Paget, whose initials H.P. appear on the truncation of the bust. The reverse Maple leaf design is totally new and by Kruger Gray, as indicated by the initials K.G. in the lower right field. From 1937 to partway through 1942 these coins were struck from an alloy containing 95.5% copper, 3% tin and 1.5% zinc (the same as the earlier small cents) but during 1942 the alloy was changed to 98% copper, 0.5% tin and 1.5% zinc. The standard weight is 3.24 grams, with a diameter of 19.05 mm (3/4 inch).
All dates from 1937 to 1952 are common in average circulated condition. Because it is not economical for us to list coins under $1.00, some dates will not be listed here unless I have high-grade specimens available.
After 1936, there are no rare date Canadian 1 cent coins. While common as dates there are some scarce to rare varieties in 1949 (A to Denticle) and in 1954 and 1955 the no shoulder fold type. Average circulated examples of all dates (including common varieties of 1949, 1954 and 1955) are of too little value to warrant listing, although we should have them available in the store in pick bins.
India received its independence on August 14, 1947 requiring that IND IMP (India's Emperor) be removed from all British Commonwealth coins dated 1948 or newer. A problem similar to that in 1937 when Edward the VIII abdicated, the new obverse designs for coins all over the British Commonwealth had to be prepared at the Royal Mint in England. Those for Canada were not ready at the beginning of 1948 and coins were needed, so early in 1948 coins were struck dated 1947 so that the IND IMP design could still be used but a small maple leaf was placed after the date indicating minted in 1948.
1947 MAPLE LEAF CENT
Pointed and blunt 7's based on the shape of the point of the 7 next to the maple twig occur on 1947 maple leaf cents. The blunt 7 is slightly scarcer than the pointed 7, but there is not much difference in value.
When the new designs arrived in 1948 with IND IMP (India's Emperor) removed, the entire inscription now reads GEORGIVS VI DEI GRATIA REX (George VI By The Grace of God King) and was used until 1952. Both 1948 and 1949 cents are found with an obverse variety where the final A of GRATIA points either between two denticles (known as either A between or A off denticle), or directly at a denticle (known as A to or A at denticle).
In 1948 both the A to and A off denticle varieties are relatively common and of equal value if it points to the large denticles. These varieties refer to how the final A of a GRATIA pointing at or between two denticles. There is a variety where the A points to a small denticle but these are scarce and I seldom have them.
For 1949 the A between denticles (also known as the A off denticles) is common while the A to denticle scarcer. Both types have large denticles.
1953 saw the introduction of Elizabeth II's portrait designed by Mary Gillick,whose initials appear on the bust truncation. The reverse remains Kruger-Gray's maple leaf design, with his initials in the lower right. The flans remain 19.05 mm, 3.25 grams of 98% copper, 0.5% tin and 1.5% zinc
1953 NSS CENT
The early 1953 dies had the shoulder fold weakly cut so the shoulder fold was usual not present, although on some well struck examples you may see a trace of it. This made the Queen's shoulder appeared bare which many people thought to be inappropriate. Known as the No Shoulder Strap (NSS) or No Shoulder Fold (NSF) variety, the easiest way to determine these is by the strong serifs at the top and bottom of the I's in II and DEI on the obverse.
1953 SS CENT
Later in 1953 the dies were re-designed with a deeper shoulder fold which usually will be visible on the coin, although not on some weaker strikes. Known as the Shoulder Strap (SS) or Shoulder Fold (SF) variety, the easiest way to be certain of this variety is because the serifs at the top and bottom of the I's on the obverse are much smaller to the point the I's nearly appear straight. This is the scarcer of the two types.
Shoulder Fold examples worn to VF or lower may have the shoulder fold worn off and looking at the shape of the I's is the only way to be certain.
From 1954 to 1964 the obverse shoulder fold design was intended for all examples but some 1954 proof-like sets contain cents struck with a 1953 NSS die resulting a 1954 NSF variety. No 1954 circulation strikes were struck with this variety but some PL sets were broken up and spent so circulated examples have occasionally turned up (I have only ever seen one). In 1955 some circulation strikes were struck from a left over 1953 die, resulting in a 1955 NSS variety that is not found in mint sets. Fraudsters have been known polish the shoulder fold lines off regular examples, and some regular strikes are weakly struck so the shoulder fold does not show, but in both cases the I's will not be serifed so it is important to check that letter form to confirm these varieties.
Note that 1954 cents in Proof-like quality will normally have slightly purple-red tone and are considered "red" that way. I am not sure why this tone only happens on this date.
1954 CENT NSS
In 1954 one of the dies used on Proof-like coins for the official mint sets was of the NSS variety and can be differentiated by the heavily Serifed I's on the obverse. It appears it may have been as many as 1 in 20 PL sets had these, and like most 1954 PL cents they usually have the purple-red tone. No 1954 NSS cents were issued for circulation via bank rolls and while I have seen a circulated one it was likely from a mint set someone broke up and spent.
1955 CENT NSS
All 1955 circulation strikes were intended to be the shoulder fold variety but a left over 1953 NSF obverse die appears to have been accidentally used, resulting in 1955 NSF examples. These coins always look slightly worn, even in mint condition, resulting from that die been somewhat worn when first used on these. One must look at both sides of a 1955 NSF cent and the grade will be based more on the reverse design which was struck with a fresh die. As with the 1953 and 1954 NSS varieties the heavy serifs on the I's is how you identify these.
1962 DOUBLE DATE CENT
Some 1962 cents have considerable doubling on last three digits of the date with the ghost under date shifted up slightly from the main date. Known as the DOUBLE DATE variety, it is very similar to that seen on some 1962 5 cents, suggesting machine doubling where a problem with the minting press causes the die to bounce or rock during striking creating a slightly double strike with an off-set, where both the 1 and 5 cents with this feature struck on the same press. This variety was listed by Zoell as #D86p.
1962 HARP CENT
Some 1962 dies have vertical lines between the 1 of "1 CENT" and the notch in the maple leaf, probably die polish marks. Commonly known as the "HARP" but when the lines are stronger at the bottom it is also known as the "GUITAR" variety. While not listed in the standard catalogues Hans Zoell catalogues it as #K86c.
1962 HANGING 2 CENT
A die clash caused the Queen's chin to be transferred to one reverse 1962 cent die, resulting in a faint line curling from the left maple leaf to the top of the 2, known as the "hanging 2" variety.
1963 Hanging 3 CENT
A die clash caused an outline of the Queen's chin to transferred to one reverse 1963 cent die, resulting in a faint line curling from the left maple leaf to the top of the 3 and is known as the Hanging 3 variety.
One sometimes sees various mint errors on this series of 1 cents which have only a clear head, but the reverse with the date cannot be read. I have a small group of these certified by CCCS in their hard holders. I offer them based on the CCCS comments:
Elizabeth II Errors, 1965-1981 type
1965 saw an updated more mature portrait of the Queen wearing a tiara, by Arnold Machin. The reverse design by Kruger-Gray was retained unchanged, as was the specifications of 3.24 grams, 19.05 mm, of 98% copper, 0.5% tin and 1.5% zinc.
There are four varieties of the 1965 cent, based on the size of the beads around the Queen's head, and the shape of the top right of the 5:
Many type 4 examples exhibit doubling of the INA in REGINA and the beads opposite REGINA, which is common and illustrated below. The doubling of the bead makes it look like a small bead over large bead, but it is the lower outline of the bead that defines the bead size, which is confirmed by the A pointing at that lower outline, while on the small bead the A points between two beads (slightly closer to the lower bead). The beads on a T-3 with large bead usually do not exhibit that doubling.
A points at bead.
A points between beads.
In celebration of Canada's 100th anniversary of Confederation, all coins issued depicting an animal common to Canada, with a dove by Alex Covillie on the 1 cent. These were struck in huge numbers and are very common now, even in grades up to MS-63. Lesser one have very little value.
Please note that up to 2011 when I describe a coin to be Proof-like (PL) I mean a coin from a mint set, intestinally struck to a higher quality than normal, but worth less than a MS (Mint State) coin from a bank roll in the same grade. They are fairly easily differentiated by their strike and luster. ICCS and some references call such coins NON-CIRCULATING NUMISMATIC MINT STATE which I feel will cause confusion in beginning collectors. Starting in 2012 the mint stopped making intentionally nicer coins for the standard sets and the coins are all simply MS (mint state) except for specimen and proof examples.
Beginning in 1971, the mint begins striking three different striking qualities of coins, with a fourth added in 1981 :
Mint state (abbreviated MS) which are coins struck for issue through the banks and have average lustre and surface qualities. In most cases MS coins have little value unless in the highest range of the MS coins, and those are seldom seen. I don't list most dates in MS because they are not of high enough value to justify the time and trouble to list and/or ship them.
Proof-like (abbreviated PL) are standard mint set coins, usually from the pliofilm packaged sets, red double penny sets, and later the blue book set, but in later dates there were a variety of other types of sets they can come from. PL coins have a much higher lustre than MS coins, mostly because they are struck from dies in their newest die state. They also have very minimal marks (the average PL is a PL-64) as they did not go through as many of the mint handling processes as MS coins do, but they are not perfect coins and one should not expect them to be absolutely mark free.
Specimen (abbreviated SP or SPEC) which were in the black leather double dollar sets from 1971 to 1980, and for later dates in various types sets. Like PL coins they are struck from dies in their freshest die state but differ in being double struck to give them a higher lustre and sharper images, and they do not go through any mint handling processes before going into the sets so are nearly mark free. The rims tend and edges tend to be a little sharper although this is not obvious on a casual inspection. When I list a coin as a specimen, it is because I personally took it from a specimen set before listing it here.
Proof (abbreviated PR) coins are very nice coins found mostly issued in the double dollar black leather boxed proof sets starting in 1981, although some specialty coins did come other ways. The coins are clearly differing from the other striking qualities by being double struck from specially prepared dies so they have mirror fields and frosted images (and ultra cameo effect) and are specially handled so they go into the sets in near perfect condition as possible.
1979 Double Date
Some 1979 cents show clear doubling on the date and occasionally other parts of the design. The degree and exact position of the doubling varies from coin to coin indicating this is machine doubling were the die was slightly loose and the doubling is created as the die bounces on striking. While not expensive, these are difficult to find.
In 1980 while the design and alloy remain the same but the weight was reduced from 3.24 grams to 2.8 grams, the diameter from 19.05 mm to 19.00 mm, and the thickness from about 1.5 mm to 1.38 mm. Most people did not notice the change and while a 0.44 gram weight reduction does not sound like much, with a mintage of about 1 billion coins per year the raw material savings to the mint was huge. This standard was only used in 1980 and 1981.
1981 saw the introduction of proof sets to replace the double dollar specimen sets. The proof coins have frosted images against mirror fields and while specimen strikes continued to be struck, they were in other types of sets. Proof sets proved more popular than specimen sets so proof coins of this period are fairly abundant but both continued to be struck right up to 2012 end of the one cent.
In 1982 the weigh was again reduced, from 2.8 grams to 2.5 grams even tough the diameter increased from 19.00 mm to 19.1 mm. This was achieved by a change from round to 12 sided thus decreasing the amount of metal needed to achieve that diameter. The alloys remained the same but there was a minor design modification to the reverse where the denticle border was replaced by a beaded border.
1983 cents are found in two varieties in the beads around the Queen's head. The far bead variety has slightly smaller beads nearly 1/2 way between the rim and the tip of the Queen's bust. The near bead variety beads are slightly larger and only about 1/3 of the way between the rim and the bust. This can be difficult to determine unless you have the two side by side to compare.
Both varieties are found in MS, Proof-like, Specimen and Proof quality. The CCN trend sheet and the Charlton Standard Catalogue both list the far bead is the more common in all striking qualities. In my experience that is true for MS the near bead is more common in Proof-like, Specimen and Proof quality.
1985 cents are very common with a blunt 5 (straight up and down on the top front of the 5) and is found in all striking qualities. The pointed 5 variety (front top of the 5 angles to the right) is much scarcer and only found circulation (MS) strikes, never in mint sets. I seldom have the pointed 5 available and based on recent sales on ebay the CCN trend listings well below the real market values for this type.
1990 saw and update the Queen's portrait to a more mature style wearing a crown, designed by Dora de Pedery-Hunt. This issue caused some concern when many people noticed the Queen was wearing a King's crown rather than a Queen's crown, and people thought it was an error that would be recalled. That crown was designed for George IV around 1830 to be a comfortable light weight crown, and has been worn by every King and Queen (including Elizabeth) since then, and is the correct crown for the design of these coins. Kruger-Gray's maple leaf design remains on the reverse, as does the alloy of 98% copper, 0.5% tin and 1.5% zinc, with 12 sides at 19.1 mm and 2.5 grams.
1992 was Canada's 125th anniversary of confederation, and all 1 cents of this year have the date shown as the double date 1867-1992.
Starting with 1996, on 1 cents with the proof-like strikes, the finish is different than in previous years. Instead of the overall high lustre finish over the entire coins, the 1996 cents have a matte finish with high lustre only on the portrait and maple leaves. The result is more like a reverse of the cameo proofs, although the degree of contrast is not consistent and some are slightly more dramatic than others.
1997 saw a major change in the cent coins. The designs remained the same with the mature crowned bust of the Queen by Dora de Pedery-Hunt, and reverse maple leaf design by Kruger-Gray, but the alloy was changed to a pure zinc core plated with copper. The coins were made round (rather than 12 sided) and are 19.05 mm with the reduced weight 2.25 grams. From 1997 to 2000 all 1 cent in MS, Proof-like and Specimen strikes were on these new blanks but Proof coins continue on solid bronze flans. I recently examined a 1997 specimen set, and found no clear distinction between the Proof-like and specimen 1 cents as both had the matte backgrounds and higher lustre designs. When I list them as PL or Specimen it is because I personally took them out of the appropriate sets.
In 1998, a W mint mark was placed below the Queen's head on coins minted at Winnipeg, although those were all in proof-like sets. Coins struck at Ottawa, including those in mint sets made at Ottawa in later years, have no mint mark. All circulation (MS), specimen and proof coins were without mint mark. The finish on 1998 proof-like coins returns to high luster finish, while specimen coins retain the slightly matte finish fields with high lustre designs that first appeared in 1996.
In 1999, the mint sets were all minted in Ottawa so do not have a mint mark. The proof-like coins all have the high lustre finish while the specimen coins have the vague reverse cameo finish. I have noted that a high percentage of 1999 proof-like cents have a surface with a lot of very small (nearly microscopic) bubbles, probably resulting from problems with the plating process while copper plating the coins with the zinc core. If ordering one of these in Proof-like striking you should expect it to have that feature. The Specimen strikes do not seem to have this problem, nor do the proof strikes while are solid bronze blanks so are not plated.
1999 P TEST CENT
As a cost saving measure in 1999 the Canadian Mint made plans to strike 1, 5, 10, 25 and 50 cent coins on plated steel blanks. The one cents look like copper as they were first nickel plated then copper plated prior to striking. All other denomination were nickel plated, then copper plated, then nickel plated again so they looked like nickel coins. A P for plated on steel was placed below the Queen's portrait so they could be differentiated.
First struck only as test tokens for vending machine companies to calibrate their equipment to and the companies were supposted to return them to the mint when done with them. Some came on the market at very high prices, up setting mint officials who struck an additional 20,000 sets to sell to collectors at much lower prices, both making money for the mint and disrupting the market for those vending machine companies.
Packaged like Proof-like sets their exact status is unclear and while I prefer to call them Proof-likes, others including ICCS call them Mint State (or Uncirculated). The mintage of only 20,000 makes them nearly as scarce as 1948 dollars but at a tiny fraction of the price. The vinyl packaging often leaves a light film on them which can be removed with rubbing alcohol.
I recently bought a large group of world coins from a company that has used them to test their equipment to make sure it would not accept them as Canadian coins, but the same company has used the 1999 P coins and in this group I found a number of the true test token examples of the one cent that did not come from the later mint sets. There are two distinct die deterioration varieties not found in the later mint sets, proving these are the genuine ones sent out as test tokens.
Most 2000 coins in all striking qualities have nothing below the Queen's bust. A few very rare examples exist with the P and are accidentally released test coins. Some of the PL and Specimen coins come with the W for Winnipeg below the bust. PL coins have a high lustre even finish. Specimen coins have high lustre images with matte backgrounds.
Beginning in 2001, 1 cent coins come in three alloys. MS, Proof-like and specimens coins are found with a P (for plated) below the Queen's portrait if the flans are copper plated on steel, without the P if the flans are copper plated zinc, except all proof coins are on solid bronze or copper flans (depending on the year) with nothing below the Queen's bust.
2002 cents were part of a special issue for the Queen's 50th anniversary, with the date on the obverse below the Queen's portrait written as the double date 1952-2002. I have had many phone calls from people saying they had a 1 cent with no date on it, but they need only turn the coin over and look below the portrait to find one.
2003 was an interesting year for Canadian coins, with a number of varieties including the introduction of a new effigy of the Queen without a crown.
2003 CENT Old Effigy
Coins struck earlier in 2003 have the crowned effigy of the Queen first introduced in 1990 and are found both with a P below the Queen's bust on plated steel or without the P if on plated zinc (MS only) and for solid bronze blanks from proof sets. Most proof-like and all specimen and normal proof sets in 2003 are of this bust type.
A variety of these included in the covers of mint reports, with a mintage of less than 8,000, have a Proof finish with selective gold plating on the Maple Leaves giving them a green appearance.
2003 CENT New Effigy
Later in 2003 the Queen's bust was redesigned without a crown. Timed to celebrate the 50th anniversary of her coronation, the new effigy Coronation Portrait was introduced showing her without a crown but as it became the standard portrait for later years it is commonly known as the New Effigy. All New Effigy examples are on plated steel with the P. Those with just the P are only found from bank rolls for circulation with some Proof-like sets struck at Winnipeg found with WP to designate the Winnipeg mint, the only time the W and P appear on coins at the same time.
2004 and all later dates use the new effigy portrait. Circulation strike (MS) coins occur on both copper plated steel flans with the P below the Queen's head, and copper plated zinc flans without the P. Proof-like and specimen coins only exist with the P on plated steel blanks. Proof coins are on pure copper or bronze flans without the P. As in previous few years, Proof-like coins have an over all even lustre while specimen examples have high lustre designs with matte backgrounds. Proof strikes with gold plated leaves exist on copper plated zinc flans from mint report covers.
2005 circulation strike (MS) coins are found on copper plated steel flans with the P and copper plated zinc flans without the P. Proof coins are on pure copper flans. As with the previous few years, Proof-like coins have an over all even lustre while Specimen strikes have high lustre designs with matte backgrounds. Proof strikes with gold plated leaf also exist on copper plated zinc flans for the mint report covers.
2006 is the year the mint logo first appears Canadian 1 cents. Early 2006 coins still have the P (plated on steel) and non-P (plated on zinc). Later in 2006 and continuing for the following years both types were still made in all coins have a stylized maple leaf mint logo below the portrait and only way to tell them a part is with a magnet. Proof strikes continue to be on non-plated solid copper or bronze blanks with nothing below the bust.
With all the different P, no-P, and logo dies used in 2006, occasionally flans got mixed up and plated zinc blanks were accidental struck with the P for plated steel blanks, and plated steel blanks were accidental struck without the P. These are not types but rather off metal blank errors and when I list them I will list them as errors.
Beginning in 2007 all 1 cents have the Logo below the Queen's portrait, so I will no longer mention it in descriptions. Both Zinc (non-magnetic) and steel (magnetic) core blanks were used for circulation coins and can only be differentiated with a magnet. The non-magnetic ones were only about 1% of the mintage so are scarce. Proofs continue to be non-magnetic on solid copper or bronze. Specimen examples are all magnetic. Most proof-like examples are magnetic but some much scarcer non-magnetic examples are found with a matte finish in some of the hard pack mint sets.
All 2008 circulation, proof-like and specimen examples are on magnetic steel core blanks. The only non-magnetic examples are the Proof's on solid copper or bronze blanks.
All circulation strike 2010 cents (MS) are non-magnetic as they are in copper plated zinc blanks, and most examples will show a minor degree of surface imperfections due problems with the plating process and which do not affect the grade. All proof strikes are on solid copper or bronze flans as so also non-magnetic. Those found in Proof-like and Specimen sets are always magnetic.
In 2011 the mint stopped minting intentionally superior coins for Proof-like (standard) mint sets, rather using normal MS coins that had not gone through all the handling processes, resulting in most cents from these sets grading MS-64, although MS-65 examples are still scarce. With no way to differentiate between MS-63 or better coins from sets vs rolls, and MS-64 and being common, I cannot justify the higher prices earlier MS-64 examples. I cents of 2011 and 2012 I will price MS-63 at $0.50, MS-64 at $2.00 and MS-65 @ $12.00. Specimen coins struck with frosted backgrounds and mirror designs I price slightly higher than the MS-64 price at $4.00.
Both copper plated zinc non-magnetic and copper plated steel magnetic 1 cents were minted in 2011 for circulation and in standard mint sets and once removed from the roll or set cannot be differentiated so I price them the same price. The specimen and proof strikes have distinctive finishes and are scarcer so are priced higher. All Specimen strikes are on copper plated steel magnetic blanks. Proof strikes are on non-magnetic solid copper or bronze blanks.
The characteristics and striking qualities are the same as for 2011.
Please note that up to 2010 I describe coins as Proof-like (PL) when from a mint set. PL coins are easily differentiated by their superior strike and luster and although nicer than MS coins from bank rolls are generally worth less. ICCS and some references call these coins "NON-CIRCULATING NUMISMATIC MINT STATE" which I feel is confusing. Starting in 2011 the mint stopped making intentionally nicer coins for standard mint sets, instead using MS (mint state) coins which had not gone though some of the normal mint handling procedures that leave marks on MS coins. Specimen and proof sets still use specially struck coins, which have a very different finish.
© 1997-2021 R & T Enterprises Ltd.